Vanishing point - the horns of the dilemma
As Africa’s poaching crisis deepens, controversial calls to legalise the trade in rhino horn have been gaining ground in a last-ditch attempt to stop the pointless slaughter of these iconic wild animals. Steve and Ann Toon report.

 

 

It’s a classic scene. The dawn sun is coating two barrel-bodied black rhinos in a light that is as golden as maple syrup. They are stretching their legs on the open plains and giving us quite the show, but their twitching ears suggest these myopic, curmudgeonly creatures are alert to our presence. All too soon they turn away and hightail it...

We prefer to think of African wildlife roaming the savannah, as in the TV documentaries, free from the restrictions of fencing and human intervention. But these two rhinos are highly protected animals, not only by distant perimeter boundaries but also by heavy, if discreet, security. In this African reserve of 25,000ha no fewer than 150 men are employed just to protect the 126 rhinos.

The brutal killing of Africa’s rhinos for their horns is on the rise. Last year in South Africa, home to more than three quarters of Africa’s total rhino population, it reached epidemic proportions. Some 668 rhinos were poached in 2012. In 2011, 448 rhinos were lost. Compare that to 2007 when only 13 rhinos were poached.

Despite the beefed up anti-poaching patrols and state-of-the-art security measures (drones are being explored), the official death toll is likely be much, much higher by the time you’re reading this.

With rhino horn now worth more than its weight in gold, commanding prices as high as $60,000 per kilogram on the black market, it’s not surprising that this poaching epidemic has spread beyond South Africa. Sophisticated crime syndicates are currently plundering Africa’s natural heritage for the rhino horn across the iconic creature’s range. And it too is on the increase.

Last September we were taken by field rangers in Kenya’s Lewa Wildlife Conservancy – a successful, private sanctuary for rhinos and other species – to see the crumpled carcass of a white rhino shot at close range just a few days earlier. Lewa had no poaching incidents between 1983 and 2009, only for the peaceful streak to end with three killings during 2010 and 2011. Sadly, things escalated even further in 2012, with seven rhinos falling at the hands of poachers. Elsewhere in Kenya the statistics reveal a big spike in poaching in the last few years.

In Namibia’s Kunene region, a stronghold of the desert-adapted black rhino that has previously escaped the reach of poachers due to its remoteness, a mother and her calf were found dead this December – the mother’s horns had been hacked off.

Left unchecked, experts predict poaching at the current rate will outpace the annual population growth rate of rhinos by as early 2016. In future, travelling to Africa to see the Big Four rather than the Big Five is a distinct possibility.

The situation has become so grave that radical solutions are being widely discussed, including the possibility of legalising the trade in rhino horn. In South Africa, former home affairs’ chief Mavuso Msimang has been tasked with advising the government on whether the country should petition to lift the ban on horn sales at the next meeting of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).

There’s been a groundswell of opinion in favour of legalisation among private rhino owners and leading conservationists in the last year. Suggestions are that horn traded could be sourced from animals that have died naturally or be harvested from live rhinos (the horn grows back after dehorning). Those in favour of this controversial move argue it would not only help reduce the killing of rhinos but would generate much-needed funds for rhino conservation.

The private sector, which has some 27 per cent of South Africa’s total rhino population across 400 reserves, has played a huge part in rhino conservation in South Africa in recent years, building up populations and creating vital new habitat.

But as poaching has escalated, a number of private sector owners have bailed out, disinvesting themselves of their rhinos for two reasons: the animals’ value has dropped by 50 per cent and the annual costs to keep them secure are spiralling beyond what owners can afford to pay, in some instances mounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

According to Pelham Jones, chairman of South Africa’s Private Rhino Owners’ Association, around 10 to 15 per cent of private owners have already sold their rhinos – potentially reducing the range for future population growth. Meanwhile South Africa National Parks (SANParks) is to introduce big rises in tourist fees at the end of 2013 simply to meet the rising costs of fighting the daily rhino war.

SANParks is responsible for Kruger National Park, home to the world’s biggest rhino population. The reserve has 40 per cent of the African rhino population and has been hard hit by poaching, losing 425 rhinos last year. Markus Hofmeyr, Kruger’s Head of Veterinary Services, has the job of assisting law enforcement officers with post-mortem reports.

“My personal view is that if we can make the rhino worth more alive than dead we’ll win this war,” he told us. He suggested that if private rhino owners were allowed to sell rhino horn this would provide a safety net for wild rhinos in national reserves.

“I don’t see why that should be a negative situation. We’re living in a changing world and if we don’t understand what’s driving the demand for horn, and we’re not stopping it, we need to think of alternative ways of dealing with it.

“I think we need to view the preservation of rhinos in our national parks and wildlife reserves as the sacred cow – we must not intervene there, we must not dehorn them or try to artificially increase their breeding rates – but we need a buffer and that’s where the private guys could come in if they had added value in keeping rhinos.”

If legal trading were to go ahead a lot of complex issues would have to be sorted out first. “How you’re going to regulate it and ensure the horn you’re selling comes from the rhino you say it does and not from another poached animal,” he added.

Hofmeyr explains that SANParks’ official line is that of the government. In 2012 South Africa, despite strong lobbying by another pioneering rhino conservation body, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, failed to put forward a pro-legalisation bid to CITES. Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife had argued for a restricted trade in horn under which only stockpiled horn from natural mortalities in state reserves could be sold. The move had the backing of well-known rhino conservation guru Sir Ian Player.
Jabulani Ngubane is Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife’s Rhino Security Intervention Co-ordinator. We interviewed him just after he’d taken part in a successful sting operation to arrest one of the top criminals involved in horn trading.

“You need to think differently at a global level how you’re going to control supply and demand,” he said. “We’re confident that if we have a single, central selling organisation to control it, we can make rhinos a resource and supply horns for the next 10 years without touching new horns,” he stated.

“As guardians of the species we don’t see any alternative. Law enforcement alone is not going to solve the problem.

“The primary aim is to sell our rhino horn below the current price, so you’ll discourage guys from going to the black market. Our proposal is not based on flooding the market, like we did with ivory. The aim is to make a constant supply, maybe three or four times a year at a fixed price so guys can’t collude at auction.”

Pelham Jones is adamant legalisation is the only way left to save Africa’s rhinos. “The CITES ban has not saved the life of a single rhino, but it has helped create a massive illegal market,” he noted.

The fact remains however that when a temporary controlled trade in ivory was allowed by CITES five years ago, elephant poaching increased. Wouldn’t the same thing happen with rhinos?

Executive director of the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) Mary Rice says the legal market in ivory ended up providing “a massive smokescreen” for the illegal trade. “Because it’s available everybody thinks it is okay,” she suggested. “How can a similar programme now be considered for rhino?”

“Despite the legal trade, up to 90 per cent of ivory on the market was shown to be from illegal sources. This legal ivory was meant to flood the markets, reduce the price of ivory and thereby reduce the need for poaching,” she added. But the opposite happened and China failed to abide by assurances that no illegal ivory would be allowed to enter the market.

“A legal trade can only work where there are stringent controls in place,” she stated. “How can China possibly be considered a suitable candidate for introducing a similar system for rhino horn?”

Cathy Dean, director of leading rhino charity Save the Rhino International, says her organisation is generally in favour of sustainable use of rhinos because conservation efforts need to generate income to avoid over reliance on donor support.

But she too urges caution: “Save the Rhino has not yet reached a position on the legalisation debate. We’re concerned that occasional, one-off sales of elephant ivory have not reduced poaching for ivory. We’d like to see more detail on how the trade will be regulated, how income generated goes back into rhino conservation, and on the likely impact on demand.

“Other pre-conditions include getting a better grip on the abuse and corruption that are contributing to the present high levels of illegal trade, auditing horn stockpiles and increasing the database of horn DNA samples, so that, if trade is approved, legal horns can be distinguished from illegal horns,” she concluded.

Save the Rhino’s concerns about this last point are already being tackled in South Africa by a ground-breaking initiative to compile a complete database of rhino horn DNA. The project is headed by Dr Cindy Harper, director of Pretoria University’s Veterinary Genetics Lab. When we met her the department’s on-going caseload involved processing DNA samples from over 630 poaching incidents. She believes the unique identification system under development is the key to policing a legal rhino horn trade.

“If we want a controlled trade we can’t ever allow illegal stuff through the system and this is how we could manage it.”

Clearly this issue is as complex as it is emotive. While it continues to divide opinion in rhino conservation quarters and beyond, one thing is indisputable: time is running out for rhinos. We looked back at our travel journal entry for the first time we saw a rhino in the wild. It was in Zimbabwe in 1994, and we’d marvelled at their “very solid but bizarre shapes”. That day our love affair with these amazing animals began. Zimbabwe’s rhinos were under threat from poaching even then, but today their numbers in state reserves have all but collapsed, with some populations too small to be viable. In Kruger, if the poaching rates continue experts warn its rhinos could be wiped out as early as 2020. Can we now stand by and witness the rhino’s demise, and possible disappearance, across all African range states, without considering this controversial but timely question?

You can follow Ann and Steve Toon’s ongoing rhino photojournalism project at www.africanrhino.org


How to help
Find out more about rhinos and how you can help them, check out the following websites:
• Save the Rhino International (www.savetherhino.org)
• International Rhino Foundation (www.rhinos-irf.org)
• World Wide Fund for Nature (www.panda.org)
• Save the Rhino Trust (www.savetherhinotrust.org)


Does rhino horn have any medicinal value?
There’s no evidence that rhino horn cures cancer, though the jury seems to be out on the thorny question of whether it has fever-reducing properties. This debate is due to the complex nature of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and some conflicting scientific reports.

Although banned from the official TCM list of medicines in the 1990s, rhino horn in TCM has historically said to have ‘cold’ properties and is used to treat ‘hot’ diseases, including a patient’s perceived feeling of ‘heat’ when suffering from fever. In TCM rhino horn is also thought to have a more far-reaching role in treatment.

Some scientific reports claim there are no medicinal qualities in rhino horn, although leading rhino expert Dr Richard Emslie, scientific officer for the IUCN Species Survival Commission’s African Rhino Specialist Group, explains that western clinical trials have in the past shown it to have a slight fever-reducing effect, akin to mild aspirin.

He suggests these properties may have been exaggerated and stresses that there are valid clinical substitutes for rhino horn such as water buffalo horn, various herbs and yak horn.

“The new suggested uses for rhino horn, such as the bogus claim that rhino horn can cure cancer, are worrying,” he said.

“My personal view is that if we can make the rhino worth more alive than dead we’ll win this war” Markus Hofmeyr, Kruger’s Head of veterinary Services


What is illegaly-traded rhino horn being used for?
The main markets for rhino horn are in Asia – in particular Vietnam and China. Rapidly increasing wealth has contributed to the increased recent demand. In China rhino horn has for centuries been used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to cure fevers and reduce inflammation. Contrary to popular belief it’s not sold as an aphrodisiac. In Vietnam powdered rhino horn is used in the hope of combating a range of ailments, fuelled by recent rumours that a high-level official was cured of cancer by it. Affluent young people and rich businessmen in Vietnam use rhino horn to try and cure hangovers and to ‘detox’ after overindulging.

It’s also viewed as a status symbol and people make gifts of horn, for example to win favours from an employer.

Rhino horn is also used in Yemen to make the handles of prized daggers called jambiya.

With rhino horn now worth more than its weight in gold, commanding prices as high as $60,000 per kilogram on the black market, it’s not surprising that this poaching epidemic has spread beyond South Africa.


Farming rhino horn - the future?
One of the key people campaigning for legalisation is South African businessman John Hume. Probably the world’s biggest private rhino farmer, he currently owns more than 800 rhinos and dehorns them every 18 months. His stockpile of horns is kept in bank vaults in Johannesburg for the day when he can legally sell them. He is sitting on a huge fortune potentially, but claims his campaign is about saving wild rhinos, not about making money – he says he is wealthy enough already. His view is that a legal market in privately harvested, farmed rhino horn would relieve the current pressure on protected wild rhinos.

He said: “If there was legislation we farmers would have something to say to the kingpins, the buyers of rhino horn: ‘You don’t have to kill rhino to get the horn. I’m growing it for you. I’m bringing it to you. If you don’t poach a male rhino, it will probably produce 50 or 60kg in its lifetime. We would be quadrupling the production of rhino horn for you, so please don’t poach our rhino.’

“There is no silver bullet to stop poaching and certainly we have to increase anti-poaching measures wherever possible, but I am certain legalisation would be our best anti-poaching strategy. It will enable us to engage with people who want to do things legally and allow for new and ethical market leaders to emerge.

“The people are wrong who point a finger at me and say I’m only doing this for money. I promise you I don’t need legalisation, but rhinos do. My rhino horn stocks are my fastest-growing asset. If I don’t sell them I don’t care.

“And if legalisation opens a Pandora’s box, it can always be slammed shut again,” he concluded.

 

Next >
Safari Planner
Subscribe
Quiz
Get started!!
Search The Site

Polls
How do you read a book or magazine on safari?
  
Newsletter
Please enter your email address to sign up

SafariBookings
MAD Bookings
Tau Game Lodge
Royal Zambezi Lodge
0 queries executed